(PS) Yegorov v. Counsulate of Ukraine in San Francisco, No. 2:2014cv01886 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/10/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Yegorov v. Counsulate of Ukraine in San Francisco Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DMITRIY YEGOROV, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-1886-KJM-EFB PS v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONSULATE OF UKRAINE IN SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. 17 18 On January 6, 2016, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend.1 The 19 20 order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended 21 complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended 22 complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 23 24 responded to the order. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 28 1 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 6 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 7 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 8 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 9 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: February 10, 2016. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
