(PC) Robinson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, No. 2:2012cv02717 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/17/12 ORDERING that the Clerk is directed to assign a district judge to this action; it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Robinson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN ROBINSON, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-2717 KJN P vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, 14 15 ORDER AND Defendants. 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 17 By an order filed November 9, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file a complete in 18 forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement within thirty 19 days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 21 order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or certified trust account statement. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 24 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 26 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 2 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 3 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 5 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 DATED: December 17, 2012 7 8 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 robi2717.fff 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
