Malibu Media, LLC v. Unknown, No. 2:2012cv02480 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/29/2012 ORDERING that the 16 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Does 2-32 are DISMISSED without prejudice. The 12 motion to dismiss and/or sever filed by Doe #23 is DENIED AS MOOT. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
Malibu Media, LLC v. Unknown Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, a California corporation, 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 No. 2:12-cv-2480 JAM DAD vs. 14 JOHN DOES 1 through 32, 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER / 17 In this action plaintiff filed an ex parte application for expedited discovery to 18 serve Rule 45 subpoenas on Internet Service Providers to obtain identifying information 19 applicable for the Doe defendants. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). 21 On October 9, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 22 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 24 and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no objections have been filed 25 by any party. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 9, 2012, (Doc. No. 16) are 5 adopted in full; 6 2. Does 2-32 are dismissed without prejudice; and 7 3. The September 5, 2012, motion to dismiss and/or sever filed by Doe #23 (Doc. 8 No. 12) is denied as moot. 9 DATED: November 29, 2012 10 11 /s/ John A. Mendez 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.