(PC) Morris v. Drummond et al, No. 2:2012cv00816 - Document 25 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/9/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Morris v. Drummond et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORVILLE M. MORRIS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-0816 JAM JFM P vs. G. DRUMMOND, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed April 19, 2012, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 17 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. By orders filed May 22, 2012 and June 28, 18 2012, plaintiff was given additional thirty day periods in which to file an amended complaint. 19 The last thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 20 otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 2 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: August 9, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 12 morr0816.fta 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
