(PS) The Bank of New York Mellon v. Levine et al, No. 2:2012cv00640 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/4/12 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 3/15/12 are adopted in full; and this action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Sutter. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) The Bank of New York Mellon v. Levine et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-12-640 JAM CKD PS vs. 13 MICHAEL LEVINE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state 17 court. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 18 302(c)(21). 19 On March 15,2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on defendants and which contained notice to defendants that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 22 Defendants have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 15, 2012 are adopted in full; and 2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of 4 California, County of Sutter. 5 DATED: May 4, 2012 6 7 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
