(PC) Smith v. Sacramento Sheriff Department, Elk Grove Branch Jail, No. 2:2011cv03090 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/15/12: This action is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Smith v. Sacramento Sheriff Department, Elk Grove Branch Jail Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH A. SMITH, 11 Plaintiff, vs. 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-3090 LKK DAD (PC) SACRAMENTO SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 15, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2012, are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. 3 4 P. 41(b). 5 DATED: March 15, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
