Thompson v. Swarthout
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/2011 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TIMOTHY CLASH THOMPSON,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-2693 KJN P
vs.
GARY SWARTHOUT,
Respondent.
14
ORDER
/
15
Petitioner consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28
16
17
U.S.C. § 636(c). By an order filed October 20, 2011, petitioner was ordered to file an application
18
to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned
19
that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now
20
expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an application to
21
proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is
22
dismissed without prejudice.
23
DATED: November 22, 2011
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
thom2693.fff
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
