Prime Healthcare Services Shasta, LLC, v. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield, et al.,
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/21/2011 GRANTING 17 Motion for 45-Day Extension of Time. The "Plan" shall have up to, and including, 1/20/2012, to respond to the First Amended Complaint. (Michel, G)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS BLUE )
)
SHIELD, an Arkansas Corporation;
WAL-MART STORES, INC., an Arkansas )
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, )
)
Inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
_____________________________________ )
PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –
SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company doing business as Shasta Regional
Medical Center,
NO. 2:11-cv-02626-LKK-CMK
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 20, 2012
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
11-cv-02626-LKK-CMK
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
TO JAN. 20, 2012
1
The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to
2
First Amended Complaint between Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC, doing
3
business as Shasta Regional Medical Center (“Shasta”) and Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
4
5
6
7
8
Associates’ Health and Welfare Plan, incorrectly named as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Plan”),
finds that good cause exists to enter an order granting the Stipulation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plan shall have up to, and including, January 20,
2012, to respond to the First Amended Complaint.
9
10
11
DATE: November 21, 2011.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
11-cv-02626-LKK-CMK
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
TO JAN. 20, 2012
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
