(SS) Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2011cv02520 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/29/11; IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submit ted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the c ourt. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).(Matson, R)

Download PDF
(SS) Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BAILEY J. NELSON, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, CIV S-11-2520 GGH vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER; and FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed October 4, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty- 17 eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed 18 plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. IT IS 21 HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case. For the 22 reasons given in the October 4, 2011 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action 23 be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 4 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: November 29, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 GGH:076/Nelson2520.fta.wpd 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.