(PC) Ward v. Ives et al, No. 2:2011cv02501 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/27/2011 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PC) Ward v. Ives et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD AARON WARD, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 14 vs. RICHARD IVES, et al., Respondents. 15 16 No. CIV S-11-2501 CKD P FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed November 9, 2011, petitioner’s habeas application was dismissed 17 and petitioner was granted thirty days’ leave to file an amended complaint for alleged violations 18 of petitioner’s civil rights by federal officials. The thirty day period has now expired, and 19 petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. 20 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 26 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 4 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: December 27, 2011 6 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 13 ward2501.fta 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.