Genesis Specialty Tile & Accessories, LLC et al v. Amerus Life Insurance Company of Iowa et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/7/2011 CONTINUING Hearings on 8 , 17 , 18 and 19 Motions to Dismiss until 1/30/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Opposition to Motions to Dismiss due by 1/13/2012. Reply due by 1/23/2012. (Michel, G)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KURT A. KAPPES, SBN 146384
STEPHEN E. PAFFRATH, SBN 195932
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1201 K Street, Suite 1100
Sacramento, CA 95814-3938
Telephone: (916) 442-1111
Facsimile: (916) 448-1709
kappesk@gtlaw.com
paffraths@gtlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants
AMERUS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
GENESIS SPECIALTY TILE & ACCESSORIES,
LLC; ELEFTHERIOS EFSTRATIS;
ELEFTHERIOS D. EFSTRATIS; PATRICIA E.
EFSTRATIS; JESSICA N. EFSTRATIS;
THOMAS A. JOHNSON; NORA E. RUNDELL,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERUS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
IOWA; AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY
COMPANY f/k/a/ AMERUS LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a corporation, RAYMOND F.
OLMO, an individual; R.F. OLMO &
ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation; MARSHALL
KATZMAN, an individual; UNITED FINANCIAL
GROUP, LTD, a corporation; DAVID
ZUCCOLOTTO; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive
Defendants.
_________________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-02489-LKK-DAD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
ORDER
Hearing: December 5, 2011
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Ctrm:
4
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 2:11-cv-02489-LKK-DAD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
SAC 442,102,961v1 11-3-11
1
Plaintiffs Genesis Specialty Tile & Accessories, LLC, Eleftherios Efstratis, Eleftherios D.
2
Efstratis, Patricia E. Efstratis, Jessica N. Efstratis, Thomas A. Johnson, and Nora E. Rundell
3
(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Amerus Life Insurance Company, Aviva Life and Annuity Company,
4
Raymond F. Olmo, R.F. Olmo & Associates, Inc., Marshall Katzman, and David Zuccolotto
5
(“Defendants”) hereby stipulate to continue the hearing on, and briefing schedule related to, the
6
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action, as
7
set forth below:
8
1.
9
10
11
12
Each of the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, all
currently scheduled for hearing on December 5, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., are continued for hearing to
January 30, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.;
2.
Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended
Complaint, currently due on November 21, 2011, will be due on January 13, 2012.
13
3.
Defendants’ reply, currently due on November 28, 2011, will be due on January 23, 2012
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED
15
Respectfully submitted,
16
17
18
Dated: November 4, 2011
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
19
By: /s/ Stephen E. Paffrath__
Kurt A. Kappes
Stephen E. Paffrath
Attorneys for Defendants
AMERUS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
AVIVA LIFE AND ANNUITY
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: November 4, 2011
KLINEDINST PC
25
By: /s/ Connie M. Anderson___
Connie M. Anderson
Reina G. Minoya
Attorneys for Defendant
MARSHALL KATZMAN
26
27
28
2
Case No. 2:11-cv-02489-LKK-DAD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
SAC 442,102,961v1 11-3-11
1
Dated: November 4, 2011
2
3
WINGET SPADAFORA &
SCHWARTBERG, LLP
By: /s/ David Maurer_________
Brandon S. Reif
David Maurer
Attorneys for Defendants
RAYMOND F. OLMO & RF OLMO &
ASSOCIATES
4
5
6
7
8
Dated: November 4, 2011
9
By: /s/ Barbara J. Mandell______
Barbara J. Mandell
Lyndon H. Hong
Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID ZUCCOLOTTO
10
11
12
13
MANDELL & ASSOCIATES, PC
Dated: November 4, 2011
GUY KORNBLUM & ASSOCIATES
14
By: /s/ Walter Crump_________
Walter Crump
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ELEFTHERIOS EFSTRATIS, ELEFTHERIOS
D. EFSTRATIS, PATRICIA E. EFSTRATIS,
JESSICA N. EFSTRATIS, THOMAS A.
JOHNSON, AND NORA E. RUNDELL
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: November 7, 2011
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 2:11-cv-02489-LKK-DAD
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
SAC 442,102,961v1 11-3-11
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
