(PC) Deneke v. Cate, et. al., No. 2:2011cv02368 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/29/11 ORDERING that a district judge be assigned to this case. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to follow court orders and for the reasons set forth in the September 30th order. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Deneke v. Cate, et. al. Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROLANDO REINER DENEKE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-11-2368 GGH P vs. 13 MATTHEW CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER & FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed September 30, 2011, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to 17 file an amended complaint. In the September 30th order, the court informed plaintiff of the 18 deficiencies in his original complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district judge be assigned to this case. 21 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice for failure to follow court orders and for the reasons set forth in the September 30th 23 order. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 \\\\ 25 1 26 Mail sent to plaintiff has been returned as undeliverable, but plaintiff has failed to inform the court of an updated address. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 2 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 3 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 6 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 7 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 8 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 DATED: November 29, 2011 10 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 GGH: AB 12 dene2368.fta 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
