Hobley v. Karelas et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/11 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEON HOBLEY, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-11-2359 EFB P A.R. KARELAS, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a prisoner without counsel, has filed a complaint alleging civil rights violations. 16 17 See 42 U.S.C. §1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. See 28 19 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On September 15, 2011, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee 20 21 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(a). Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to pay the filing fee or file an application to 23 proceed in forma pauperis and was warned that failure to comply would result in this action 24 being dismissed. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 2 3 4 The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, filed a completed in forma pauperis application, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this action is DISMISSED. Dated: November 14, 2011. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?