Kolodrivsky v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/9/2011 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(b); this case is CLOSED. (Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
VALENTINA KOLODRIVSKIY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
CIV S-11-2236 GEB GGH PS
vs.
13
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
__________________________________/
ORDER
16
On October 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
17
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the
18
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
19
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
20
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
21
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
22
1983).
23
24
25
26
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed
October 14, 2011, are ADOPTED and:
1
1
2
3
4
1. This action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(b).
2. The case is closed.
Dated: November 9, 2011
5
6
7
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
