D'Lil v. Riverboat Delta King, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER #11 for DISMISSAL signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/3/2011. Defendant Old Sacramento Business Association, Inc. is DISMISSED without prejudice. This shall not affect status of pending claims against remaining defendants. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH, Esq. (No. 148213) tim@thimeschlaw.com 158 Hilltop Crescent Walnut Creek, CA 94597-3457 Telephone: (925)588-0401 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLLYNN D’LIL 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 HOLLYNN D’LIL, CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-JFM Civil Rights Plaintiff, 9 10 v. 11 RIVERBOAT DELTA KING, INC.; CITY OF SACRAMENTO; OLD SACRAMENTO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, INC.; and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, 12 13 LIMITED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF SELECTED PARTY; [Proposed] ORDER Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Pursuant to the Stipulation between Defendants Regarding 17 Old Sacramento Business Association, Inc. (attached hereto at 18 Exhibit 1), i.e., that the entity is not an indispensable or 19 necessary party, Plaintiff hereby requests the dismissal of OLD 20 SACRAMENTO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, INC., without prejudice. 21 request shall not affect the status of pending claims against 22 //// 23 24 25 26 27 28 158 HILLTOP CRESCENT WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597-3452 (925) 588-0401 Limited Request for Dismissal Without Prejudice of Selected Party; Order: Case No. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-JFM This 1 the remaining Defendants. 2 3 Dated: November 3, 2011 THIMESCH LAW OFFICES TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLLYNN D’LIL 6 7 8 9 ORDER 10 11 SO ORDERED. 12 DATED: NOVEMBER 3, 2011 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 158 HILLTOP CRESCENT WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597-3452 (925) 588-0401 Limited Request for Dismissal Without Prejudice of Selected Party; Order: Case No. 2:11-CV-02230-WBS-JFM —2—

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?