Frias v. Corvington et al
Filing
13
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/30/2011 ORDERING that case 2:10-cv-3213 JAM GGH is related with member of case 2:11-cv-2178 JAM GGH. Because both cases are already assigned to this Court, the captions shall remain the same.(Duong, D)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VASCO ESPINOZA,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRICK A. CORVINGTON, Chief
Executive Officer; and
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE,
16
Defendants.
17
LORRAINE FRIAS,
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRICK A. CORVINGTON, Chief
Executive Officer; and
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE,
22
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:10-CV-03213 JAM-GGH
RELATED CASE ORDER
Case No. 2:11-CV-02178 JAM-GGH
23
24
Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these
25
actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.
26
2005).
27
judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of judicial effort
28
and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.
Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same
1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
The parties should be aware that relating the cases under
2
Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are
3
assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is
4
effected.
Under the regular practice of this court, related cases
5
are generally assigned to the judge to whom the first filed action
6
was assigned.
7
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that these actions are related.
8
Because both cases are already assigned to this Court, the captions
9
shall remain the same.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated: November 30, 2011.
12
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________
13
U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
