-DAD (PS) Blue Mountain Homes LLC v. Bell et al, No. 2:2011cv02155 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/22/11: The noticed hearing on plaintiff's motion to remand 10 is vacated and that motion is dropped from the court's December 2, 2011 law and motion calendar. The motion may be re-noticed if this case is not remanded by the assigned district judge upon review of the undersigned's findings and recommendations recommending remand. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
-DAD (PS) Blue Mountain Homes LLC v. Bell et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLUE MOUNTAIN HOMES LLC, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-2155 KJM DAD PS vs. RONNIE D. BELL, et al., 14 ORDER Defendants. 15 / 16 By Notice of Removal filed August 15, 2011, this unlawful detainer action was 17 removed from Solano County Superior Court by defendant Renee L.H. Bell, who is proceeding 18 pro se.1 Accordingly, the matter has been referred to the undersigned for all purposes 19 encompassed by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On August 22, 2011, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations 21 recommending that this action be summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, 22 County of Solano and that this case be closed. The time for filing objections to those findings 23 and recommendations has expired, and the findings and recommendations have been submitted 24 to the assigned district judge for review. 25 26 1 Named defendant Ronnie D. Bell has not joined in the removal. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 On October 28, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to remand. (Doc. No. 10.) This 2 motion has been noticed for hearing before the undersigned on December 2, 2011. As noted 3 above, however, on August 22, 2011, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations 4 recommending that this matter be remanded. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the noticed hearing on plaintiff’s 6 motion to remand (Doc. No. 10) is vacated and that motion is dropped from the court’s 7 December 2, 2011 law and motion calendar. The motion may be re-noticed if this case is not 8 remanded by the assigned district judge upon review of the undersigned’s findings and 9 recommendations recommending remand. 10 DATED: November 22, 2011. 11 12 13 14 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.pro se\bluemtn-bell2155.vac.hrg 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.