Vogan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/11 ORDERING that Moving Defendants' request to appear telephonically is granted. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 BILLI VOGAN and HAROLD TRAUPEL,
individuals,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
vs.
14
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.; US BANK
15 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
FOR WFMBS 2005-AR12; WELLS FARGO
16 HOME MORTGAGE; and FIRST
AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING
17 SOLUTIONS FORMERLY KNOWN AS
FIRST AMERICAN LOANSTAR TRUSTEE
18 SERVICES, LLC; and Does 1-100, inclusive,
19
20
Case No. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-KJN
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND U.S.
BANK, N.A.’S REQUEST TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY
Date:
Time:
Room:
Judge:
November 2, 2011
9:30 a.m.
6, 14th Floor
The Hon. John A. Mendez
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
August 5, 2011
None
Defendants.
Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (wrongfully sued as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and
21
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage) and U.S. Bank, N.A. . (together, “Moving Defendants”) have
22
requested to appear telephonically for the hearing on the motion to dismiss set for
23
November 2, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 before the Honorable John A. Mendez. Having
24
taken this request under consideration,
25
26
27
28
07685/0950/981977.1
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-KJN
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Moving Defendants’ request to appear telephonically is
granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED: 10/24/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez__________
The Honorable John A. Mendez
U. S. District Court Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685/0950/981977.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-KJN
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?