-EFB Maxum Indemnity Company v. Court Services, Inc., No. 2:2011cv02014 - Document 26 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/31/12 ADOPTING IN FULL 25 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 19 Motion for Default Judgment. Maxum is awarded a declaration stating that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Court Services, Inc. in the Underlying Action entitled Mays v. Board of County Commissioners, Case No. 1:09-cv-00662-WJ-KBM (D.N.M.). (Meuleman, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB Maxum Indemnity Company v. Court Services, Inc. Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:11-cv-2014-GEB-EFB vs. COURT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. ORDER __________________________________/ 16 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment came on regularly for hearing on 17 May 16, 2012 before the assigned magistrate judge. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 19 On June 8, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations 21 were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 24 ORDERED that: 25 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 8, 2012, are adopted in full; 26 2. Maxum’s motion for default judgment, Dckt. No. 19, is granted; and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. Maxum is awarded a declaration stating that it has no duty to defend or 2 indemnify Court Services, Inc. in the Underlying Action entitled Mays v. Board of County 3 Commissioners, Case No. 1:09-cv-00662-WJ-KBM (D.N.M.). 4 Dated: July 31, 2012 5 6 7 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
