(SS) (PS) Johnson Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2011cv01898 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/13/2011 REASSIGNING CASE to Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings. New Case Number: 2:11-CV-1898 JAM EFB PS. RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed for failure to procecute and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after beings served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(SS) (PS) Johnson Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GAI TOI JOHNSON WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-11-1898 EFB vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendant. / 15 16 On September 19, 2011, the court ordered plaintiff to comply with its June 26, 2011 17 order within 14 days. Dckt. No. 5. The court warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the 18 order might result in the dismissal of the case. The allotted time has passed and plaintiff has 19 failed to comply with the September 19 order. 20 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute and the Clerk be directed to close the case. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 3 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 4 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: December 13, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.