Colt v. Swarthout
Filing
3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/28/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2011) [Transferred from cand on 6/29/2011.]
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
OAKLAND DIVISION
6
7
THOMAS MICHAEL COLT,
Petitioner,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 11-1687 PJH (PR)
v.
ORDER OF TRANSFER
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden,
Respondent.
/
12
13
This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. He seeks review of a denial
14
of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings. He was convicted in the Superior Court of San
15
Mateo County, which is in this district, and is housed at California State Prison-Solano,
16
which is in the Eastern District.
17
Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district
18
of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, the district of confinement is the preferable
19
forum to review the execution of a sentence. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman,
20
875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because petitioner's challenge goes to the execution of
21
his sentence, this petition is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
22
District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b).
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.11\COLD1687.TRN.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?