Colt v. Swarthout

Filing 3

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/28/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2011) [Transferred from cand on 6/29/2011.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 7 THOMAS MICHAEL COLT, Petitioner, 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 11-1687 PJH (PR) v. ORDER OF TRANSFER GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Respondent. / 12 13 This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. He seeks review of a denial 14 of parole by the Board of Parole Hearings. He was convicted in the Superior Court of San 15 Mateo County, which is in this district, and is housed at California State Prison-Solano, 16 which is in the Eastern District. 17 Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of confinement or the district 18 of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); however, the district of confinement is the preferable 19 forum to review the execution of a sentence. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 20 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because petitioner's challenge goes to the execution of 21 his sentence, this petition is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern 22 District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b). 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2011. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.11\COLD1687.TRN.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?