Daniels v. Board of Prison Hearings

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/11 ORDERING that Petitioner submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and the Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISIAH DANIELS, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-1697 KJN P BOARD OF PRISON HEARINGS, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for 16 17 a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in 18 forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 19 1915(a). Therefore, petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate 20 affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an 23 affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; 24 petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and 25 //// 26 //// 1 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma 1 2 pauperis form used by this district. 3 DATED: June 24, 2011 4 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 dani1697.101a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?