Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER 17 for extension signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/10/2011. Defendant's time to respond to Complaint is EXTENDED to 11/17/2011. (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
5
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8938
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: theophous.reagans@ssa.gov
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
JASON L. THOMAS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Acting Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
CIVIL NO. 2:11-1649 CKD
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
19
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for Defendant to respond to
20
21
Plaintiff’s complaint be extended from November 3, 2011 to November 17, 2011.
All other dates in the Courts Scheduling Order are extended accordingly.
22
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
2
This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s answer.
Defendant requests the additional time to review the transcript.
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
5
Dated: November 7, 2011
/s/ Andrew T. Koenig
(authorized via telephone)
ANDREW T. KOENIG
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: November 7, 2011
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
6
7
8
9
11
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
12
Attorneys for Defendant
10
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
16
Dated: November 10, 2011
17
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
de
thomas1649.eot
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 - Answer to Complaint
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
