Niebuhr, et al v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 6/13/2011 ORDERING 5 that all dates and obligations of the parties in 2 the Court Order Requiring a Joint Status are hereby VACATED pending the JPML Court's decision on the pending Motion to tra nsfer pursuant to 28:1407 for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings, which is set to be heard on 7/28/2011; if the Motion to Transfer is denied, the 6/2/2011 Court Order and its attendant obligations are reinstated and will run from the da te that the parties receive the notice of denial; Xanodyne's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action is hereby EXTENDED to 20 days from the docketing of the case in the transferee court, or as otherwise ordered by the transferee court; if the Motion to Transfer is denied, then the time for Xanodyne to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action is hereby EXTENDED to 20 days from the date of the order denying the Motion to Transfer. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 MARK NIEBUHR and DONNA NIEBUHR, individually, CASE NO. 2:11-CV-01498-FCD-EFB 12 ORDER STAYING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNTIL AFTER THE RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION TO TRANSFER PENDING BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 16 XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Kentucky Corporation, [Stipulation and Request for Order Staying All Further Proceedings Filed Concurrently Herewith] Defendant. 17 Complaint Fled: April 19, 2011 18 19 20 21 Pursuant to the parties joint Request and stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 22 1. All dates and obligations of the parties in the June 2, 2011 Court Order Requiring a Joint 23 Status are hereby vacated pending the JPML Court’s decision on the pending Motion to 24 transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial 25 Proceedings, which is set to be heard on July 28, 2011. If the Motion to Transfer is 26 denied, the June 2, 2011 Court Order and its attendant obligations are reinstated and will 27 run from the date that the parties receive the notice of denial. 28 -1ORDER STAYING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNTIL AFTER MOTION TO TRANSFER IS DECIDED CASE NO. 2:11-CV-01498-FCD-EFB 1 2. Xanodyne’s time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action is 2 hereby extended to (20) days from the docketing of the case in the transferee court, or as 3 otherwise ordered by the transferee court. Alternatively, if the Motion to Transfer is 4 denied, then the time for Xanodyne to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the 5 complaint in this action is hereby extended to twenty (20) days from the date of the order 6 denying the Motion to Transfer. 7 8 9 DATED: June 13, 2011 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER STAYING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNTIL AFTER MOTION TO TRANSFER IS DECIDED CASE NO. 2:11-CV-01498-FCD-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?