Becker v. United States Attorneys, et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/21/2011 DENYING plaintiff's 6 Motion to Compel defendant to Answer w/in 30 days as MOOT. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DENNLY R. BECKER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. CIV S-11-1491 KJM EFB PS
vs.
14
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED
STATES ATTORNEYS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
/
16
17
On June 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a complaint under the Freedom of Information Act
18
(“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and paid the filing fee. Dckt. No. 1. Thereafter, the Clerk of Court
19
issued a summons directing defendant to serve an answer to plaintiff’s complaint within 60 days
20
of service of that summons. Dckt. No. 3.
21
On June 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendant to serve an answer within
22
thirty days, as required by 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(C). Section 552(a)(4)(C) provides that
23
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the defendant shall serve an answer or otherwise
24
plead to any complaint made under this subsection within thirty days after service upon the
25
defendant of the pleading in which such complaint is made, unless the court otherwise directs for
26
good cause shown.” Therefore, plaintiff is correct that defendant is required to serve an answer
1
1
or other response to plaintiff’s complaint within thirty days after service, not sixty days as
2
indicated in the summons.
3
However, on June 21, 2011, defendant filed a notice of appearance for defendant, the
4
United States Department of Justice, indicating that defendant will appear within 30 days of
5
receipt of the summons and complaint, or by July 6, 2011. Dckt. No. 8. In light of that
6
representation, plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to answer within thirty days, Dckt. No. 6,
7
is denied as moot.
8
9
SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 21, 2011.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?