Johnson v. The Black Oak Restaurant II, Inc. et al
Filing
14
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/8/11. All discovery shall be completed by 6/11/2012. Designation of Expert Witnesses is due by 3/26/2012, and rebuttal expert disclosure is due by 4/16/2012. All dispositi ve motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 7/25/2012. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 9/12/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimber ly J. Mueller. The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement by 8/29/2012. The Jury Trial is SET for 1/14/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; and is estimated to last approximately four days. Trial briefs are due by 12/31/2012. (Kastilahn, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SCOTT N. JOHNSON,
NO. CIV.S 11-1457 KJM CKD
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
ORDER
13 THE BLACK OAK RESTAURANT II,
INC, et al.,
14
Defendant.
15 ____________________________________/
16
The court issues this order without holding a scheduling conference. Having reviewed
17 the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on October 26, 2011, the court makes the following orders:
18 I.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
19
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without leave
20 of court, good cause having been shown.
21 II.
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
22
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of
23 court, good cause having been shown. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
24 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
25 III.
JURISDICTION/VENUE
26
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, and 1367. Jurisdiction and
27 venue are not disputed.
28 /////
1 IV.
DISCOVERY
2
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be
3 completed by December 1, 2011. All discovery shall be completed by June 11, 2012. In this
4 context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions
5 have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate
6 order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All
7 motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance
8 with the local rules of this court.
9 V.
10
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other
11 parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial
12 not later than March 26, 2012. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report
13 prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
14 By April 16, 2012, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a
15 supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an
16 expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation
17 has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation
18 shall be accompanied by a written report which shall also comply with the conditions as stated
19 above.
20
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
21 likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
22 witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
23 the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
24 anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
25 promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
26 available for deposition.
27
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used at trial
28 to present evidence under Rules 702, 703, and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
2
1 include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
2 opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
3 case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
4 for the purposes of litigation). Each party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
5 retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
6 express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must
7 state in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
8
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render an
9 informed opinion, and give their bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and
10 complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted
11 to testify at the trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after
12 deposition taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by June 11,
13 2012.
14 VI.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
15
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or
16 other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than July 25, 2012. The parties may obtain
17 available hearing dates by calling Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, at (916) 930-4193.
18
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule 230
19 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions with the following additions:
20
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
21
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
22
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding
23
the legal holiday.
24 Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
25 the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
26 652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
27
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty (20)
28 pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases must
3
1 be made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the
2 motion.
3
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device designed
4 to address the admissibility of evidence. The court will look with disfavor upon dispositional
5 motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions in limine.
6
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could have
7 been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off date
8 may constitute waiver of such issue.
9 VII.
10
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for September 12, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. At least one
11 of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial
12 Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable
13 to attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with
14 the case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
15
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final Pretrial
16 Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for
17 oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference statement by August
18 29, 2012. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the matters to be
19 included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b),
20 the parties are to provide the court with a plain, concise statement that identifies every non21 discovery motion tendered to the court and its resolution.
22
Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds for
23 sanctions.
24
Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, counsel
25 shall submit to chambers the word processing version of the statement, in its entirety (including
26 the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
27
The parties shall, in a concise manner, jointly identify only undisputed core facts
28 separately that are relevant to each claim. Disputed core facts should then be identified in the
4
1 same manner. The parties are reminded not to identify every fact in dispute but only those
2 disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of each claim. Each disputed fact and
3 undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered. Where the parties are unable to agree
4 what are the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core disputed facts in the above
5 manner.
6
Each party shall identify and concisely list each disputed evidentiary issue which will be
7 the subject of a party’s motion in limine.
8
Each party shall identify the points of law which concisely describe the legal issues of the
9 trial which will be discussed in the parties’ respective trial briefs. Points of law should reflect
10 issues derived from the core undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument or
11 authorities with any point of law.
12
The parties shall prepare a joint statement of the case in plain concise language which
13 will be read to the jury at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to
14 inform the jury what the case is about.
15
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to attach to
16 the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they propose to
17 offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief statement of the
18 nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each party may file
19 separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial Conference
20 Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final
21 Pretrial Order.
22
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed
23 alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for
24 plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be
25 marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds "ZZ" exhibits shall be
26 then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5 etc. All multi page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened
27 together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not
28 include excerpts of depositions, which may be used to impeach witnesses. In the event that
5
1 plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to
2 by the designation the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to
3 this detail so that all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being
4 identified with both a number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning
5 exhibits and, to the extent possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and
6 listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2.
The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of
7
8 witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the
9 standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a
10 party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, no later
11
12 than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.
Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include documents
13
14 which will be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil
15
16 Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the
17 formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)
18 the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof
19 and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial
20 Conference Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these
21 aims in mind.1 A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include
22 monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other
23 sanctions as the court deems appropriate.
24 /////
25 /////
26
27
28
1
“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the
undisputed facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may
summarily dispose of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm.,
770 F.2d 866, 868-69 (9th Cir. 1985).
6
1 VIII. TRIAL SETTING
2
The trial is set for January 14, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a jury trial length
3 of approximately four days. Trial briefs are due by December 31, 2012.
4 IX.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
5
No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be set at
6 the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the event
7 that an earlier settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution
8 Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing. Because the
9 case will be tried to a jury, all parties should be prepared to advise the court whether they will
10 stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.
11 However, the parties may not request referral to VDRP or a judge-convened settlement
12 conference until the court receives, in writing from both parties, a status report describing what
13 steps they have taken to settle the case on their own and a representation that they have
14 exhausted other settlement possibilities.
15 X.
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
16
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
17 Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
18 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not
19 constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or
20 counsel does not constitute good cause.
21 XI.
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
22
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless objections
23 are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 DATED: November 8, 2011.
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
7
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
