Schendel et al v. Ace Mortgage Funding, LLC et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/16/11 ORDERING that pursuant to 26 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), the complaint in the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED in its entirety without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
2
Holly S. Burgess (SBN 104757)
LAW OFFICES OF HOLLY S. BURGESS
680 Auburn Folsom Road, Suite 109
Auburn, CA 95603
Tel: (530) 889-8900
Fax: (530) 820-1526
hollyburgess@lohsb.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs Dennis Schendel
and Catherine Schendel
7
8
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
16
17
18
vs.
ACE MORTGAGE FUNDING, LLC;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS); CHICAGO TITLE;
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; QUALITY
LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION; LSI TITLE
AGENCY, INC.; and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF
COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
14
15
CASE NO.: 2:11-CV-01411-JAM-JFM
DENNIS SCHENDEL, an individual; and
CATHERINE SCHENDEL, an individual;
The Court, having reviewed the NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE filed by Plaintiffs, DENNIS SCHENDEL and CATHERINE SCHENDEL, pursuant
to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), hereby orders as follows:
///
///
///
///
27
28
- 1.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint in the above-captioned matter is dismissed
in its entirety without prejudice.
3
4
Dated: 11/16/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
John A. Mendez
JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 2.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
