Esco Marine Inc. v. SS Pacific Star et al
Filing
172
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/3/2011 ORDERING that the sale of the vessel SS Pacific Star shall proceed as ordered on 11/7/2011; DIRECTING the Clerk to serve this Order on the USM and the EPA. (cc: USM, EPA) (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ESCO MARINE INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
Civ. S- 11-1353 KJM GGH
vs.
SS PACIFIC STAR,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
On November 2, 2011, the United States Marshal filed a memorandum requesting
17
clarification of whether sale of the vessel should proceed on November 7, 2011, in light of a
18
report by the Environmental Protection Agency, based on an inspection of the vessel on April 6,
19
2004, in which high levels of PCBs were detected. This report came to the attention of the
20
Marshal by way of an email from an EPA representative, pointing out that the Toxic Substances
21
Control Act prohibits distribution in commerce of this vessel for purposes of use or export.
22
It is doubtful that the mere sale of the vessel per se constitutes “use” or “export.”
23
But in any event, despite the invitation of the court to do so, the EPA has not sought to intervene
24
in this action, and its informal email to the Marshal does not require action on the part of the
25
court.
26
\\\\
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
2
1. The sale of the vessel SS Pacific Star shall proceed on November 7, 2011 as
3
4
ordered.
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Valerie Duran at the
5
U.S. Marshals Service, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at the following email
6
address: Rollins.Christopher@epamail.epa.gov.
7
DATED: November 3, 2011
8
9
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH:076/EscoMarine1353.usm.wpd
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?