McCain v. California Highway Patrol et al
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/17/11: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against defendant California Highway Patrol (Dkt. No. 79) is denied without prejudice. 2. The hearing on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, which is presently set for December 15, 2011, is vacated. (Matson, R)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TERRYLYN MCCAIN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-01265 KJM KJN PS
v.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL,
et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment
17
against defendant California Highway Patrol (“CHP”), which plaintiff filed on November 16,
18
2011 (Dkt. No. 79).1 The undersigned denies plaintiff’s motion without prejudice.
19
On August 4, 2011, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations that
20
recommended that: (1) the CHP’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims against it be granted,
21
(2) all of plaintiff’s claims against the CHP be dismissed with prejudice, and (3) the CHP be
22
dismissed from this action (Dkt. No. 38). The district judge assigned to this case has not yet
23
resolved the findings and recommendations pertaining to plaintiff’s claims against the CHP.
24
However, if the district judge adopts the findings and recommendations in full, plaintiff’s motion
25
1
26
This case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local
Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1
1
for partial summary judgment would be rendered moot because all of plaintiff’s claims against
2
the CHP would be dismissed with prejudice, and the CHP would no longer be a defendant in this
3
action. Accordingly, the undersigned denies plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment
4
without prejudice, and plaintiff may re-file that motion after resolution of the pending findings
5
and recommendations if the CHP remains a defendant in this action.
6
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1.
8
9
10
11
12
Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment against defendant
California Highway Patrol (Dkt. No. 79) is denied without prejudice.
2.
The hearing on plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, which is
presently set for December 15, 2011, is vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 17, 2011
13
14
15
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
