-DAD (PS) You Never Know, LLC v. Vanderbeck et al, No. 2:2011cv01263 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/18/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 6 are adopted in full; Defendant Vanderbeck's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is denied; Plaintiff's motion to remand and request for fees and costs 3 is denied as moot; and this action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer, and the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Copy of remand order sent to Placer County Court. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
-DAD (PS) You Never Know, LLC v. Vanderbeck et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YOU NEVER KNOW, LLC, Plaintiff, 11 12 No. CIV S-11-1263 FCD DAD PS v. 13 RICHARD SHEILS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Defendant Ron Vanderbeck, who is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled 17 unlawful detainer action, filed a notice of removal from Placer County Superior Court, along 18 with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On June 22, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and on defendant Ron Vanderbeck, and which contained 22 notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 23 within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The fourteen-day 24 period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 26 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 22, 2011 (Doc. No. 6) are 3 adopted in full; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. Defendant Vanderbeck’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is denied; 3. Plaintiff’s motion to remand and request for fees and costs (Doc. No. 3) is denied as moot; and 4. This action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer, and the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. DATED: July 18, 2011. 11 12 13 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.