Dela Cruz et al v. Yuan et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/21/11 ORDERING that Defendants Edward Py Jen Yuan dba Imperial Mortgage and Imperial Development Inc. are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 VICTOR A. DELA CRUZ and MARY M. DELA CRUZ, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 11 v. 16 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COMPANY; JP MORGAN CHASE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR WAMU MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-PR1 TRUST; CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 17 Defendants.* ________________________________ 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-01176-GEB-DAD ORDER OF DISMISSAL 18 19 Plaintiffs were required to respond to an Order filed November 20 8, 2011, by either filing proof that Defendants Edward Py Jen Yuan dba 21 Imperial Mortgage and Imperial Development Inc. were served with process 22 or a document explaining why service was not effected within Federal 23 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)’s prescribed service period. (ECF No. 30.) 24 This filing was due no later than November 18, 2011. Id. 25 8, 2011 Order warned Plaintiff that failure to make the required showing 26 by the deadline “may result” in these Defendants being dismissed from 27 this action. The November 28 * The caption has been amended according to this Order. 1 1 Plaintiff failed to respond to the November 8, 2011 Order by 2 this deadline. Therefore, Defendants Edward Py Jen Yuan dba Imperial 3 Mortgage and Imperial Development Inc. are dismissed from this action 4 without prejudice. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 21, 2011 7 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?