Davis v. Carlton et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/21/11: Plaintiff shall, within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff, with this order, a blank Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, used in nonprisoner cases. (Kaminski, H)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MICHAEL S. DAVIS,
11
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-01100 KJN P1
Plaintiff,
vs.
C. CARLTON, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff filed this civil rights action while a state prisoner; shortly thereafter,
17
plaintiff, in person, filed a notice of change of address indicating that he was no longer
18
incarcerated. Routine documents served by the Clerk of Court on April 27, 2011 (and returned
19
as undeliverable on May 11, 2011), were personally re-served on plaintiff on May 3, 2011.
20
Before the court may proceed with screening plaintiff’s complaint, plaintiff must file a new
21
application to proceed in forma pauperis—the current application is premised on the balance in
22
plaintiff’s prison trust account, which is no longer pertinent.
23
////
24
////
25
1
26
This action is referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B), Local General Order No. 262, and E.D. Cal. L.R. (“Local Rule”) 302.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff shall, within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, file a
3
new application to proceed in forma pauperis; and
4
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff, with this order, a blank
5
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, used in nonprisoner cases.
6
DATED: June 21, 2011
7
8
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
davi1100.ord
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
