Jones v. Knipp
Filing
13
ORDER denying 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/06/11. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
PHILLIP BLAIR JONES,
11
Petitioner,
No. CIV S-11-1006 GGH P
Respondent.
ORDER
12
13
vs.
KNIPP,
14
15
/
16
Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no
17
absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d
18
453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at
19
any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing
20
§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be
21
served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.
22
/////
23
/////
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s May 10, 2011, request
2
for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 8) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion
3
at a later stage of the proceedings.
4
DATED: June 6, 2011
5
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
6
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
GGH:kly
jone1006.110
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?