Johnson v. Klein et al
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/17/11 ORDERING that an Initial Scheduling Conference set for 01/06/12 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve an amended status report on or before December 23, 2011; defendants shall file and serve amended status reports on or before December 30, 2011. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SCOTT N. JOHNSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 2:11-cv-0920 DAD
vs.
JAMES C. KLEIN; and YVONNE
J. KLEIN,
ORDER SETTING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
The two defendants and plaintiff have consented to proceed before the assigned
17
magistrate judge. By order filed November 14, 2011, the action was reassigned to the
18
undersigned.
19
20
21
Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT
IS ORDERED that:
1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, January 6, 2012,
22
at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in
23
Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.
24
2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference either by counsel or,
25
if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf. Any party may appear at the status
26
conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the
1
1
courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours
2
before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be
3
provided by the party requesting telephonic appearance.
4
3. Plaintiff shall file and serve an amended status report on or before December
5
23, 2011, and defendants shall file and serve amended status reports on or before December 30,
6
2011. Each party’s status report shall address all of the following matters:
7
a.
Progress of service of process;
8
b.
Possible joinder of additional parties;
9
c.
Possible amendment of the pleadings;
10
d.
Jurisdiction and venue;
11
e.
Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
12
f.
Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof,
including disclosure of expert witnesses;
g.
Future proceedings, including the setting of
appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law
and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial
conference and trial;
h.
Modification of standard pretrial procedures
specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity
or complexity of the action;
i.
Whether the case is related to any other case,
including matters in bankruptcy;
j.
Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate
judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement
judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of his
so acting, or whether they prefer to have a
Settlement Conference before another magistrate
judge;
k.
Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a
United States Magistrate Judge; and
l.
Any other matters that may aid in the just and
expeditious disposition of this action.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/////
2
1
4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report, or failure to appear
2
at the status conference either in person or telephonically, may result in an order imposing an
3
appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110 and 183.
4
DATED: November 17, 2011.
5
6
7
8
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.consent\johnson0920.ossc
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
