Johnson v. McCormack et al
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER 6 for extension of time signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/6/2011. Defendants Anna M. McCormack, Jerome Chetcuti, and Nazzarena Chetcuti shall have until 7/15/20101 to respond to Complaint. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
kiSCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516
FAX (916) 481-4224
E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net
HU
5
U
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
Scott N. Johnson
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
Richard A. McCormack, et al,
Defendants
17
18
19
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.2:11-cv-00778-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL JULY
15, 2011 FOR DEFENDANTS ANNA M.
MCCORMACK INDIVIDUALLY AND
D/B/A MID VALLEY ROCK COMPANY;
JEROME CHETCUTI INDIVIDUALLY
AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE CHETCUTI
FAMILY 1992 TRUST, DATED
OCTOBER 15, 1992; NAZZARENA
CHETCUTI INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
TRUSTEE OF THE CHETCUTI FAMILY
1992 TRUST, DATED OCTOBER 15,
1992 TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
22
23
Pursuant
to
Local
Rule
6-144
(a),
Plaintiff
Scott
N.
24
Johnson and Defendants, Anna M. McCormack Individually and
25
26
d/b/a Mid Valley Rock Company; Jerome Chetcuti Individually
27
and as Trustee of the Chetcuti Family 1992 Trust, dated
28
October 15, 1992; Nazzarena Chetcuit Individually and as
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Trustee of the Chetcuti Family 1992 Trust, dated October
1
2
15,
1992,
by
and
through
their
respective
attorneys
of
3
record, Scott N. Johnson; Jason Borg, stipulate as follows:
4
5
1. No extension of time has been previously
6
obtained.
7
8
9
10
2. Defendants Anna M. McCormack Individually and
d/b/a Mid Valley Rock Company; Jerome Chetcuti
Individually and as Trustee of the Chetcuti
11
Family 1992 Trust, dated October 15, 1992;
12
Nazzarena Chetcuit Individually and as Trustee
13
14
of the Chetcuti Family 1992 Trust, dated
15
October 15, 1992 is granted an extension until
16
July 15, 2011 to respond or otherwise plead
17
reference to Plaintiff’s complaint.
18
3. Defendants Anna M. McCormack Individually and
19
20
d/b/a Mid Valley Rock Company; Jerome Chetcuti
21
Individually and as Trustee of the Chetcuti
22
Family 1992 Trust, dated October 15, 1992;
23
Nazzarena Chetcuit Individually and as Trustee
24
of the Chetcuti Family 1992 Trust, dated
25
26
27
October 15, 1992 response will be due no later
than July 15, 2011.
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 2, 2011
1
2
3
Dated:
June 2, 2011
4
/s/Jason Borg_______ ___
U
U
U
Jason Borg,
5
Attorney for Defendants
6
Anna M. McCormack
7
8
Individually and d/b/a
9
Mid Valley Rock Company;
10
Jerome Chetcuti
11
Individually and as
12
Trustee of the Chetcuti
13
14
Family 1992 Trust, dated
15
October 15, 1992;
16
Nazzarena Chetcuit
17
Individually and as
18
Trustee of the Chetcuti
19
20
Family 1992 Trust, dated
21
October 15, 1992
22
23
24
Dated:
June 2, 2011
/s/Scott N. Johnson ____
U
25
26
27
Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 3
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendants Anna M. McCormack
1
2
Individually
3
Chetcuti Individually and as Trustee of the Chetcuti Family
4
1992
5
Individually and as Trustee of the Chetcuti Family 1992
6
Trust, dated October 15, 1992 shall have until July 15,
7
2011 to respond to complaint.
Trust,
and
dated
d/b/a
Mid
October
Valley
15,
Rock
1992;
Company;
Nazzarena
Jerome
Chetcuit
8
9
Dated: 6/6/2011
10
/s/ John A. Mendez__________
11
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 4
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?