Bohannon-Hingston v. Brachfeld Law Group, P.C.
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/27/2011 DENYING plaintiff's #8 Motion to Compel and both parties' #8 #13 Motions for Sanctions. (Marciel, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SHIRLEY BOHANNON-HINGSTON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. CIV S-11-0776 FCD EFB
vs.
THE BRACHFELD LAW GROUP,
Defendant.
ORDER
/
15
16
On June 22, 2011, the court heard plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to supplement
17
its initial disclosures and for sanctions, and defendant’s counter-request for sanctions. Dckt.
18
Nos. 8, 13. Attorney Robert Gimblin appeared at the hearing on behalf of plaintiff and attorney
19
David Jung appeared on behalf of defendant. As authorized at the hearing, on June 24, 2011,
20
defendant filed a declaration in support of sanctions for attorney’s fees and/or reasonable travel
21
expenses. Dckt. No. 16. However, as stated on the record, and for the reasons stated on the
22
record, plaintiff’s motion to compel and both parties’ requests for sanctions are denied.
23
24
25
26
SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 27, 2011.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
