-KJN Johnson v. Kyeong Industrial Inc. et al, No. 2:2011cv00694 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/22/11 ORDERING that plaintiff's 20 motion for default judgment against defendants Kyeong Industrial Inc., individually and d/b/a Sams Teriyaki; Danny Rodriguez, individually and d/b/a Yaquis Taqueria; and Angelica Avina Rodriguez, individually and d/b/a/ Yaquis Taqueria is DENIED without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
-KJN Johnson v. Kyeong Industrial Inc. et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV-S-11-0694-GEB-KJN vs. KYOENG INDUSTRIAL, INC., et al., 14 15 Defendants. __________________________________/ 16 ORDER On October 21, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 18 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 19 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 26 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 21, 2011, are 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against defendants Kyeong Industrial Inc., 3 individually and d/b/a Sam’s Teriyaki; Danny Rodriguez, individually and d/b/a Yaquis 4 Taqueria; and Angelica Avina Rodriguez, individually and d/b/a/ Yaquis Taqueria (Dkt No. 20) 5 is denied without prejudice. 6 Dated: November 22, 2011 7 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.