Cigarettes Cheaper! et al v. State Board of Equalization et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/27/2011 re 37 ORDERING that the defendant Altria Group, Inc is DISMISSED with prejudice.(Duong, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Hunton & Williams LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
CIGARETTES CHEAPER!, a California CASE NO.: 2:11-CV-00631-JAM-EFB
corporation, and THE CUSTOMER
COMPANY, a California corporation,
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION
TO DISMISS ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
Plaintiffs,
WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2)
v.
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,
an agency of the State of California,
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., a Virginia
corporation, PHILIP MORRIS USA
INC., and COSTCO WHOLESALE
CORPORATION, a Washington
corporation,
Defendants.
Action Filed: January 18, 2011
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
This Court, having reviewed the stipulation signed by Plaintiffs Cigarettes
2
Cheaper! and The Customer Company, on the one hand, and Defendant Altria Group,
3
Inc. (“Altria”), on the other, and good cause being shown therefor, hereby
4
DISMISSES Altria from this action with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
5
Procedure 41(a)(2).
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/27/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
Hunton & Williams LLP
550Hunton & Williams LLP
South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?