Newhall v. City of Lodi et al
Filing
14
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) 0RDER, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/17/11. The parties are ORDERED to Show Cause in a writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on June 27, 2011, why sanctions should not be imposed against them and/or their counsel under Rule 16(f) of the FRCP for failure to file a timely status report. The written response shall also state whether the parties or their counsel are at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on 8/1/11, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference. The Status Conference is CONT'D to 8/1/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. A status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the status conference. (Kastilahn, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DEAN NEWHALL,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
v.
CITY OF LODI, LODI POLICE
DEPARTMENT, OFFICER K. KENT,
SERGEANT D. GRIFFIN, OFFICER S.
DAVIDSON, OFFICER E. AMBRIZ,
OFFICER K. SCHADLER, OFFICER N.
SAREERAM,
Defendants.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-cv-00579-GEB-KJN
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND
CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING) ORDER
16
The March 2, 2011, Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling)
17
Conference scheduled a status conference in this case on June 27, 2011,
18
and required the parties to file a joint status report no later than
19
fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference. (ECF No. 5.) The
20
March 2, 2011 Order further required that a status report be filed
21
regardless of whether a joint report could be procured. Id. at 2 n.2.
22
No status report was filed as ordered.
23
Therefore, the parties are Ordered to Show Cause (“OSC”) in a
24
writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on June 27, 2011, why
25
sanctions should not be imposed against them and/or their counsel under
26
Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file
27
a timely status report. The written response shall also state whether
28
the parties or their counsel are at fault, and whether a hearing is
1
1
requested on the OSC.1
2
August 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which
3
is rescheduled to that date and time. A status report shall be filed no
4
later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference.
5
6
If a hearing is requested, it will be held on
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 17, 2011
7
8
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
“If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact
of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that
is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged.”
Matter of
Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied,
471 U.S. 1014 (1985).
Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their
consequences, are visited upon clients. In re Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387
(9th Cir. 1985).
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
