-GGH (HC) Shippman v. Dickinson, No. 2:2011cv00561 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/14/11 ORDERING the clerk shall randomly assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GGH (HC) Shippman v. Dickinson Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT SHIPPMAN, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-11-0561 GGH P K. DICKINSON, 14 Respondent. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed March 21, 2011, petitioner’s application was dismissed and thirty 17 days’ leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, 18 and petitioner has not filed an amended application or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 19 20 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 2 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Petitioner is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: June 14, 2011 6 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 ship0561.ftahab 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
