-EFB (PC) Williams v. Kelso et al, No. 2:2011cv00543 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/3/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's 2 application to Proceed IFP is DENIED; pltf is directed to pay the $350 filing fee within 30 days; and pltf is admonished that failure to do so will result in recommendation by the magistrate judge that this action be dismissed. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
-EFB (PC) Williams v. Kelso et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK WILLIAMS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-0543 MCE EFB P vs. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 9, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2011 (ECF No. 5), are ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s February 28, 2011 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) is DENIED; 5 3. Plaintiff is directed to pay the $350 filing fee within 30 days; and 6 4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to do so will result in a recommendation by 7 8 the magistrate judge that this action be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Dated: May 3, 2011 9 10 11 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.