Argueta v. JP Morgan Chase et al
Filing
44
ORDER GRANTING 43 Defendants' Request to appear telephonically at Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/14/11.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1770 FOURTH AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101
TELEPHONE (619) 685-4800 FACSIMILE (619) 685-4811
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
10
CECILIA ARGUETA, an individual,
11
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS JP MORGAN
vs.
CHASE BANK, N.A. AND
FEDERAL HOME LOAN
J.P. MORGAN CHASE, dba
CORPORATION REQUEST TO
WASHINGTON MUTUAL F.S.B.,
APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
CORPORATION, FEDERAL HOME
LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, DISMISS SET FOR DECEMBER 5,
2011
and DOES 1 through 20,
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:11-cv-00441-WBS-GGH
17
Date: December 5, 2011
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Ctrm: 5
Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
18
19
20
Having read Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Federal Home
21
Loan Corporation (“Defendants”) request to appear telephonically, the Court, under
22
the circumstances, grants Defendants’ request to appear telephonically at
23
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss scheduled for December 5, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. The
24
court notes, however, that the fact that counsel may have to travel to a district
25
somewhat distant from counsel’s offices, particularly for hearing on a motion that
26
defendants themselves have made, should be a consideration when deciding
27
whether to undertake representation of defendants in an action pending in such a
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
district. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to
2
participate in the telephone conference call.
3
Dated: November 14, 2011
4
5
6
7
8
9
1770 FOURTH AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101
TELEPHONE (619) 685-4800 FACSIMILE (619) 685-4811
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
McCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
