Denman v. City of Tracy et al
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/7/2011 GRANTING a 45-Day Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. (Michel, G)
<![CDATA[
1 Michael R. Bracamontes (SBN 242655)
Ryan J. Vlasak (SBN 241581)
2 Kristen M. Ross (SBN 250917)
BRACAMONTES & VLASAK, P.C.
3 220 Montgomery Street, Suite 870
San Francisco, CA 94104
4 Phone: (415) 835-6777
Fax: (415) 835-6780
5 mbracamontes@bvlawsf.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Bryan Denman
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Bracamontes & Vlasak
A Professional Law Corporation
www.bvlawsf.com
11
12 BRYAN DENMAN,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
CASE NO.: 2:11-CV-00310-GEB-JFM
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT
PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO FILE A
MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE DOE
DEFENDANTS BE EXTENDED
15 CITY AND TRACY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The undersigned parties, through counsel, STIPULATE and AGREE and jointly request that:
1. On August 26, 2011, this Court ordered that Plaintiff conduct discovery forthwith in order to
discover the identity of the Doe Defendants. Plaintiff was given a deadline of 90 days to file a
motion to amend accordingly.
2. On September 6, 2011, Plaintiff propounded Special Interrogatories and Demands for
Production of Documents in order to ascertain the identities of the Doe Defendants.
3. Plaintiff has granted Defendant numerous discovery extensions because personnel from the City
of Tracy’s Police Department have been on extended leave, precluding Defendant from
responding to the outstanding discovery.
4. Accordingly, the parties agree that Plaintiff’s deadline to file a motion substitute the Doe
________________________________________
-1Denman v. City of Tracy, et al. – Stipulation and Order that Plaintiff’s Deadline to File a Motion to Substitute Doe
Defendants be Extended
2:11-CV-00310-GEB-JFM
1
Defendants in this case shall be extended an additional 45 days from the original deadline date.
2 ///
3 IT IS SO STIPULATED:
4
Dated: November 7, 2011
By:
_/s/ Michael Bracamontes__________
Michael R. Bracamontes, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff Bryan Denman
9 Dated: November 7, 2011
By:
_/s/ Richard Osman_______________
Richard W. Osman, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant City of Tracy
5
6
7
8
10
Bracamontes & Vlasak
A Professional Law Corporation
www.bvlawsf.com
11
12
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
14
1. Plaintiff’s deadline to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint substituting the Doe
15
Defendants in this case shall be extended an additional 45 days from the original deadline date.
16
Date: 11/7/2011
17
18
_________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
19
20
21
DEAC_Signature-END:
22
23
61khh4bb
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________
-2Denman v. City of Tracy, et al. – Stipulation and Order that Plaintiff’s Deadline to File a Motion to Substitute Doe
Defendants be Extended
2:11-CV-00310-GEB-JFM
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
