-EFB (TEMP) (PC) Sickler v. Curtis et al, No. 2:2011cv00205 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/10/2011 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full. Pltf's claims against dft Yusuf are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
-EFB (TEMP) (PC) Sickler v. Curtis et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH SICKLER, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-11-0205 WBS EFB (TEMP) P T. CURTIS, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On April 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Yusuf are dismissed without prejudice. DATED: May 10, 2011 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.