-EFB (TEMP) (PC) Sickler v. Curtis et al, No. 2:2011cv00205 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/12/11 RECOMMENDING that plaintiffs claims against defendant Yusuf be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (TEMP) (PC) Sickler v. Curtis et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH SICKLER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-11-0205 WBS EFB (TEMP) P T. CURTIS, et al., 14 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 16 17 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed February 24, 2011, the court found that plaintiff had stated 18 sufficient allegations against defendant Curtis and informed plaintiff he could proceed against 19 defendant Curtis only or file an amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable claims against 20 defendant Yusuf. The court also informed plaintiff that the court would consider his decision to 21 proceed only as to defendant Curtis as consent to the dismissal of plaintiff’s defective claims 22 against defendant Yusuf, without prejudice. On March 9, 2011, plaintiff returned documents for 23 service against defendant Curtis. 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Yusuf be dismissed without prejudice. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations plaintiff may file written objections 6 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 7 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the 8 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 9 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: April 12, 2011. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
