-EFB (PC) Williams v. Guzman et al, No. 2:2011cv00094 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/9/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 8/9/11, are adopted in full; Plaintiff's 1/10/11 motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is denied; Plaintiff is granted thirty days to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00; and Plaintiff is admonished that failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action. (cc Financial) (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PC) Williams v. Guzman et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LONNIE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-11-0094 WBS EFB P GUZMAN, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 9, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 9, 2011, are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiff’s January 10, 2011 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 3 2) is denied; 4 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00; and 5 4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to do so will result in dismissal of this 6 action. 7 DATED: December 9, 2011 8 9 10 11 12 / 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
