-KJN (PC) Hammonds v. Salinas et al, No. 2:2010cv03439 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/11/2011 ORDERING the clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
-KJN (PC) Hammonds v. Salinas et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO HAMMONDS, aka HAQQ SHABAZZ, 11 Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-3439 KJN P 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 17 WARDEN, et al., ORDER AND Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed January 4, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 18 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 21 22 23 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 4 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: February 11, 2011 6 7 8 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 hamm3439.fta 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.