Walton v. Sing et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/10/2011 ORDERING that, w/in 28 days, pltf shall file an opposition, if any, to the 12 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RONALD WALTON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
V. SING, et al.,
14
ORDER
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
No. CIV S-10-3167 GGH P
On April 15, 2011, defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
18
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
19
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
20
the granting of the motion . . . .” On January 31, 2011, plaintiff was advised of the requirements
21
for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a
22
waiver of opposition to the motion.
23
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
24
grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
25
inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed January 31, 2011, plaintiff was advised
26
/////
1
1
that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be
2
dismissed.
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-eight days of the date of this
4
order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file an
5
opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation
6
that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
7
DATED: June 10, 2011
8
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
GGH: AB
walt3167.46.osc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
