Hairston v. Harrington
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/09/11 ordering motion for law library access 21 is denied without prejudice. Petitioner's motion for extension of time 22 is granted. Petitioner's reply to respondent's answer is due within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY JEROME HAIRSTON,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2: 10-cv-3056 JAM KJN P
vs.
K. HARRINGTON,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ
17
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner’s May 27,
18
2011 motion for law library access, and his June 6, 2011 motion for an extension of time to file a
19
reply to respondent’s answer.
20
Petitioner alleges that he has been unable to go to the law library for the past few
21
months. However, petitioner does not discuss why he has been unable to obtain law library
22
access. For this reason, petitioner’s motion for law library access is denied without prejudice. If
23
petitioner is unable to obtain law library access to prepare his reply, he may renew his motion. A
24
renewed motion for law library access must detail petitioner’s attempts to obtain law library
25
access.
26
////
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Petitioner’s motion for law library access (Dkt. No. 21) is denied without
3
prejudice;
4
2. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 22) is granted;
5
petitioner’s reply to respondent’s answer is due within thirty days of the date of this order.
6
DATED: June 9, 2011
7
8
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
hai3056.eot
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
