(PC) Robison v. Hill et al, No. 2:2010cv02954 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 33 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/12/11. The motion 22 of defendants Grannis, Stocker and Johnson to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendants Grannis, Stocker, and Johnson shall answer the Eighth Amendment claim raised in plaintiff's complaint within ten days from the date of this order.

Download PDF
(PC) Robison v. Hill et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLEN W. ROBISON, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. PARAMVIR SAHOTA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:10-cv-2954 JAM JFM (PC) ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On June 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 6, 2011, are adopted in full; 3 2. The motion of defendants Grannis, Stocker and Johnson to dismiss is granted 4 5 in part and denied in part; and 3. Defendants Grannis, Stocker and Johnson shall answer the Eighth Amendment 6 claim raised in plaintiff’s complaint within ten days from the date of this order. 7 DATED: August 12, 2011 8 9 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.